Private equity-backed companies
Translate the investment thesis into an operating model, owned execution, and visible value capture.
M&A Integration & Value Realization
Turn the acquisition thesis into an operating business.
Axiom & Arc helps organizations integrate acquired businesses across operating model, people, process, systems, governance, brand, and execution—while protecting continuity and accelerating value realization.
Not another static integration checklist. Axiom & Arc builds the operating system that connects decisions, dependencies, capacity, readiness, and value.Axiom & Arc signature architectureIntegration Intelligence System
INPUTDeal thesisWhat value was purchased?
01Deal Thesis Map
02Difference Engine
03Disposition Matrix
04Dependency Graph
05Capacity Engine
06Decision Engine
07Readiness Model
08Value Ledger
09AI Exception Monitor
10Learning Repository
ONEOperating
BusinessContinuity · control · value
BusinessContinuity · control · value
OUTPUTRealized valueVisible in the operating enterprise
The standard for completion
Integration is not complete when the task list is complete. It is complete when the business works.
A successful integration creates one functioning enterprise capable of delivering the value the transaction was meant to create. Axiom & Arc approaches post-acquisition integration as an operating-system problem—not a series of disconnected workstreams.
The goal is not simply to integrate faster. The goal is to create a stronger operating business faster.01Investment thesis02Integration activity03Operating-model decisions04Functional dependencies05Executive decisions06Organizational capacity07Readiness08Measurable value
Designed for the post-close reality
For organizations that must make the transaction work in practice.
This offering is built for PE operators, CEOs, integration leaders, and functional executives who need an acquired business to become operationally coherent without losing the capabilities, customers, or value that made it worth buying.
High-growth organizations
Integrate new scale without allowing fragmented processes, systems, and decision rights to harden.
Acquisitive enterprises
Build repeatable integration intelligence so the organization becomes faster with every transaction.
Newly combined businesses
Protect customers, employees, controls, and operational continuity while the target enterprise takes shape.
Value-realization mandates
Move synergy and growth assumptions from the deal model into validated, implemented, P&L-visible results.
Not investment banking
Axiom & Arc does not price the deal, raise capital, issue a fairness opinion, or replace legal, tax, or financial due diligence.
Not generic project management
The work begins with the acquisition thesis, target operating choices, enterprise dependencies, executive decisions, readiness, capacity, and value—not merely a schedule of tasks.
Not a flat PMI checklist
Checklists support completeness. They do not diagnose material differences, determine disposition, resolve cross-functional contradictions, or prove that value reached the business.
What the work includes
Cross-functional by design.
Value-led by discipline.
Integration Strategy & Roadmap
Translate the deal thesis into sequenced priorities, owners, dependencies, decision points, and measurable outcomes.
Integration Governance
Establish the integration structure, executive cadence, workstream ownership, escalation paths, and decision rights.
Functional Integration
Coordinate Finance, HR, IT, Legal, Operations, Commercial, Procurement, Communications, Brand, and enterprise functions.
Operating Model Alignment
Determine what should standardize, remain local, combine, retire, or be redesigned for the target enterprise.
Dependency & Risk Management
Expose cross-functional dependencies before they become schedule failures, control issues, disruption, or rework.
Value Realization
Connect execution to synergies, cost takeout, growth assumptions, risk reduction, and strategic deal objectives.
Examples of the work
The work, the evidence, and the decision it enables.
These are not decorative workstream labels. Each example shows the practical analysis, artifacts, executive decision, and operating risk involved.
01Corporate Identity Transition
Coordinate the legal, digital, operational, and customer-facing changes required for the acquired organization to become part of the parent enterprise.
View evidence and decisions+
Corporate Identity Transition
Coordinate the legal, digital, operational, and customer-facing changes required for the acquired organization to become part of the parent enterprise.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Legal-entity and naming transition register
- Brand, domain, website, signage, and template inventory
- Customer, supplier, employee, and regulatory communication plan
- Day 1 and final-brand cutover checklist
Executive decision enabled
Which identity elements change on Day 1, which require a controlled transition, and who approves each customer-facing change?
Integration risk controlled
Customer confusion, inconsistent corporate identity, broken digital journeys, premature rebranding, and missed legal or regulatory updates.
02Finance Integration
Align how the combined company records, controls, funds, closes, forecasts, and reports the business without interrupting financial stewardship.
View evidence and decisions+
Finance Integration
Align how the combined company records, controls, funds, closes, forecasts, and reports the business without interrupting financial stewardship.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Chart-of-accounts and reporting-dimension crosswalk
- Close-calendar and opening-balance validation plan
- Treasury, banking authority, tax, and cash-management transition map
- Control-gap register and finance cutover plan
Executive decision enabled
What must conform immediately for control and reporting, what can transition later, and where is an interim bridge required?
Integration risk controlled
Misstated reporting, delayed close, uncontrolled access, cash disruption, tax exposure, and synergy claims that never become P&L visible.
03People Integration
Bring organization structure, roles, policies, rewards, payroll, benefits, leadership, and employee experience into an intentional people transition.
View evidence and decisions+
People Integration
Bring organization structure, roles, policies, rewards, payroll, benefits, leadership, and employee experience into an intentional people transition.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Organization and role-mapping workbook
- Employee census, policy, benefit, and compensation comparison
- Leadership-accountability and critical-talent risk map
- Payroll, onboarding, communications, and Day 1 readiness plan
Executive decision enabled
Which roles remain, combine, change, or require new ownership—and which differences should be preserved rather than harmonized?
Integration risk controlled
Critical-talent loss, role ambiguity, payroll or benefit failures, policy inequity, weak leadership credibility, and avoidable employee disruption.
04Technology Integration
Create a fact-based path across applications, infrastructure, cybersecurity, identity, data, interfaces, ERP, CRM, and system retirement.
View evidence and decisions+
Technology Integration
Create a fact-based path across applications, infrastructure, cybersecurity, identity, data, interfaces, ERP, CRM, and system retirement.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Application, interface, data, and license inventory
- Identity-access and cybersecurity readiness matrix
- ERP, CRM, data-migration, and integration dependency map
- Target architecture, TSA-exit, cutover, and retirement roadmap
Executive decision enabled
Which platforms become enterprise standards, which capabilities are preserved, and where must systems coexist until data and process readiness are proven?
Integration risk controlled
Access failures, cyber exposure, corrupted data, duplicate platforms, broken interfaces, expensive license overlap, and unsafe system retirement.
05Process Integration
Compare how each company actually performs the work, then design the target state instead of automatically imposing either legacy process.
View evidence and decisions+
Process Integration
Compare how each company actually performs the work, then design the target state instead of automatically imposing either legacy process.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Parent-versus-acquired process difference map
- Standardize, preserve, combine, retire, redesign disposition record
- Target-state workflow, control, ownership, and SOP design
- Training, adoption, exception, and performance measures
Executive decision enabled
Which process creates the strongest target enterprise, what must change, and what evidence proves the new process works?
Integration risk controlled
Automating waste, destroying an acquired advantage, inconsistent controls, duplicated work, local workarounds, and adoption that exists only on paper.
06Governance Integration
Create one integration management system for ownership, decisions, dependencies, escalation, readiness, executive visibility, and transition to the business.
View evidence and decisions+
Governance Integration
Create one integration management system for ownership, decisions, dependencies, escalation, readiness, executive visibility, and transition to the business.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Integration Management Office charter and workstream structure
- Executive cadence, decision rights, and escalation architecture
- Integrated milestone, dependency, RAID, and decision system
- Readiness dashboard, KPI ownership, and governance handoff plan
Executive decision enabled
Who can decide, which evidence is required, when does an issue escalate, and when is the business ready to assume ownership?
Integration risk controlled
Green workstreams masking enterprise failure, aging decisions, unclear accountability, executive surprises, and an IMO that never exits.
07Commercial & Customer Continuity
Protect revenue and customer experience while contracts, pricing, account ownership, order flow, service obligations, and market identity transition.
View evidence and decisions+
Commercial & Customer Continuity
Protect revenue and customer experience while contracts, pricing, account ownership, order flow, service obligations, and market identity transition.
View evidence and decisionsIllustrative work products
- Customer, contract, pricing, and renewal exposure register
- Account-ownership and CRM transition map
- Order-to-cash and service-continuity dependency plan
- Customer communication, escalation, and revenue-risk dashboard
Executive decision enabled
Which customers require proactive intervention, which commercial terms can change, and what must remain untouched until continuity is secure?
Integration risk controlled
Revenue leakage, missed renewals, contract breaches, pricing errors, duplicate outreach, service interruption, and preventable customer loss.
What most integration efforts miss
The risk lives between the workstreams.
A static checklist can prove that activity exists. It cannot prove that the enterprise is coherent, ready, or capturing value.
01The deal thesis is not the integration plan
+
Activity lists rarely maintain a visible connection to why the acquisition was made. Every integration choice should trace to value, continuity, controls, or an operating outcome.
02Not everything should be standardized
+
The parent-company process is not automatically the best one. Valuable acquired-company capabilities may need to be preserved, combined, or used to improve the target state.
03Green workstreams can hide an unhealthy enterprise
+
Functions may report green while unresolved dependencies, delayed decisions, or incompatible readiness assumptions put the whole integration at risk.
04Day 1 is the threshold, not the finish line
+
Operating risk often appears after close—during stabilization, transition, adoption, and operating-model alignment.
05Readiness is broader than communications
+
Real readiness includes process, system, data, leadership, policy, control, customer, and capacity conditions.
06Decision delays quietly destroy value
+
Aging decisions, ambiguous ownership, and unclear escalation paths slow milestones and allow value leakage to compound.
07Capacity is finite
+
The leaders running the business are also asked to integrate it. Ignoring that collision produces delays, errors, and brittle adoption.
The Axiom & Arc method
The Integration
Intelligence System
An enterprise operating system for improving speed, decision quality, cross-functional visibility, and value capture—not a disconnected collection of workstream updates.
THESISOPERATING
ENTERPRISEVALUE
ENTERPRISEVALUE
Deal Thesis Map
Value purchased → operating outcomes required
Difference Engine
Material differences across process, systems, policy, roles, and controls
Disposition Matrix
Standardize · preserve · combine · retire · redesign
Dependency Graph
Cross-functional sequence and hidden risk accumulation
Capacity Engine
Business-as-usual demand versus integration demand
Decision Engine
Owner, age, due date, impact, and value at risk
Readiness Model
Day 1 through stabilization readiness by dimension
Value Ledger
Value identified, validated, implemented, and realized
AI Exception Monitor
Contradictions, anomalies, and emerging risk
Learning Repository
Reusable intelligence for the next acquisition
01 · Start with the economics
Start with the deal thesis—not the checklist.
The first question is: What value was purchased? Every material integration initiative should trace back to an economic or operating assumption in the transaction.
The quantitative exhibits below are illustrative worked examples of the operating models Axiom & Arc can build. They demonstrate the method and calculation logic; they are not presented as client results.
01Deal thesis
02Value lever
03Initiative
04Owner
05KPI
06Impact
07Realization date
Deal thesisValue leverIntegration requirementMeasure
Procurement consolidationCost synergyCombine supplier spend and contractsEBITDA savings
Cross-sell opportunityRevenue growthIntegrate customer and CRM dataRevenue realization
G&A reductionOperating leverageConsolidate organization and processSG&A reduction
Faster operationsMargin improvementRedesign the processCycle time / margin
A team can complete 95% of integration tasks and still fail to deliver the economics of the deal.
02 · Acquisition Difference Map
Change discovery into validation.
Collect the evidence first. Use AI for a first-pass comparison across policies, SOPs, organization, roles, authorities, applications, controls, financial calendars, vendors, reporting, customer processes, and process maps. Human SMEs validate what matters.
Traditional effortDiscover everything manually
→Weeks of interviews, file hunting, and repeated questions before material differences become visible.
Axiom & Arc shiftValidate what matters
AI-assisted comparison produces a structured first pass; accountable experts verify the differences and disposition.
AreaParentCoTargetCoDifferenceDisposition
Expense approval6 levels3 levelsTarget fasterRedesign
CRMSalesforceHubSpotPlatform conflictStandardize
PTOFixed planUnlimitedPolicy conflictPreserve temporarily
Vendor onboarding9 steps4 stepsTarget simplerCombine / redesign
ParentCo AP9 steps8-day cycle
TargetCo AP4 steps3-day cycle
Traditional answerAdopt ParentCoStandardization without evidence
Axiom & Arc dispositionREDESIGNKeep ParentCo controls. Adopt TargetCo routing.
03 · Process + task mining
See how the work actually happens.
Process mining exposes cycle time, bottlenecks, rework, variants, control deviations, drift, and automation opportunities. Task mining then reveals the human steps creating the friction.
Observed cycle time6.8days · vendor onboarding
The headline metric identifies the delay. Task evidence shows why it exists.
- 01Open email
- 02Download attachment
- 03Copy supplier data
- 04Open ERP
- 05Rekey information
- 06Open tax site
- 07Validate tax details
- 08Return to ERP
- 09Enter bank data
- 10Send approval email
01Keep manual
02Simplify
03Automate now
04Automate later
05Eliminate
Use the integration itself to uncover recurring EBITDA improvement opportunities—not merely to move the current inefficiency into the combined company.
04 · Exception-based governance
Stop paying executives to read status reports aloud.
Workstream owners report only what changed, what slipped, which decision is needed, which dependency moved, and what value is at risk. AI summarizes the deltas. Leaders discuss exceptions.
Traditional model192leadership hours
12 leaders × 1 hour × 16 weeks
VERSUS
Exception model48leadership hours
6 required leaders × .5 hour × 16 weeks
Avoided144 hours
$21,600 at a $150 blended loaded rate
Decision SLA
Track decision age—not merely status.
Workstream48 hours
Cross-functional72 hours
Executive5 business days
Investment Committee7 days
ERP DECISION14days old
$180K
potentially at risk
- Finance testing delayed
- Cutover moves
- TSA may extend
- Support cost continues
Dynamic dependency graph
Workstream health is not integration health.
If the first activity slips, every downstream milestone should surface as threatened—even when each function has reported itself green.
01Employee master data↓
02Identity provisioning↓
03Payroll testing↓
04Benefits enrollment↓
05Day 1 readiness
HR updateEmployee transition is green.
IT updateIdentity provisioning is 12 days late.
Payroll updateTesting cannot begin until identity records are complete.
AI CONTRADICTION SCANPotential inconsistency detected.
Employee readiness may be overstated due to unresolved identity dependencies.
Human owner validates the exception.Capacity heatmap
Resistance is sometimes arithmetic.
Available Finance capacity is 420 hours per month. Actual demand is 630. Leadership must re-sequence, reduce scope, automate, add support, or knowingly accept risk.
AVAILABLE · 420 HOURS
Total demand630h150% of available transformation capacity
Evidence-based Day 1 readiness
Replace optimism with evidence.
“HR says ready” is not a readiness standard. Define the conditions, test them, expose the exceptions, and classify the actual state.
Employee Day 1 readiness91%CONDITIONAL READINESS
Payroll file validatedYes
Benefits enrollment testedYes
User identities provisioned96%
Critical access tested89%
Manager mapping complete100%
Employee communications issuedYes
Critical exceptions unresolved17
05 · Value leakage detector
Do not confuse identified synergy with realized value.
Track value through validation, approval, implementation, financial visibility, and realization. Then make the remaining gap—and the reason for it—impossible to hide.
Target$5.0M
Identified$5.6M
Validated$4.8M
Approved$4.3M
Implemented$3.4M
P&L visible$3.0M
Realized$2.7M
Remaining gap$2.3M
- Delayed vendor consolidation
- Contract termination cost
- Lower-than-expected volume
- Timing delays
- Unimplemented initiatives
Automation harvesting
The integration function should help fund the transformation.
1,500 transactions×.3 hours×$50/hour= $22,500
- Build cost
- $7,500
- Year 1 savings
- $15,000
- Recurring annual savings
- $22,500
Tool rationalization
Remove duplicated technology cost.
ParentCo
Power BI capacity available
TargetCo
Tableau · $115K annually
- Migration
- $40K
- Year 1 savings
- $75K
- Three-year gross savings
- $305K
Customer disruption radar
Do not let internal integration break external revenue.
Track major customers against every integration touchpoint so executives can intervene before disruption becomes churn.
CustomerBillingCRMOwnerContractRisk
Customer AChangingMigratedStableStableLOW
Customer BChangingMigratedChangingRenewalHIGH
06 · A learning operating system
Every acquisition should make the next one faster.
Capture the institutional knowledge, re-test assumptions as evidence arrives, document value creation, and compare integration efficiency across deals.
If this person left tomorrow, what would stop working?
Capture undocumented processes, customer history, vendor quirks, spreadsheet logic, exception handling, recurring decisions, controls, workarounds, and regulatory nuance. Use AI to convert interviews and notes into process documentation, decision trees, FAQs, searchable knowledge, and handoffs.
Re-test the deal assumptions as reality arrives.
Procurement synergy$2.0M original$3.4M Day 60 opportunity
Cross-sell$8.0M original$4.5M reforecast
Classify each assumption as confirmed, stronger, weaker, invalidated, or a new opportunity.
Document value creation while it happens.
Invoice processing11.2d→3.8d
Close cycle9d→5d
OTIF87%→96%
SG&A19%→14%
Customer churn11%→6%
Measure how efficiently integration produces value.
Integration cost$3.0M
Recurring annual value$8.4M
$2.80recurring annual value for every $1 spent
Deal A · 2.8×Deal B · 4.1×Deal C · 1.6×
Acquisition 01Heavy manual discovery
Acquisition 02Reusable taxonomy + templates
Acquisition 03Known decisions + dependencies
Acquisition 04Predictive integration patterns
Acquisition 05Repeatable operating system
Axiom & Arc turns M&A integration into a learning operating system that gets faster, more predictive, and more value-focused with every acquisition.
Integration becomes an enterprise capability—not a recurring emergency.The disposition matrix
Decide what becomes the target enterprise.
Each material difference is evaluated rather than automatically forced into the parent company’s current state.
Standardize
Adopt an enterprise standard where consistency creates control, scale, or clarity.
Preserve
Protect a capability that differentiates the acquired business or creates value.
Combine
Build a stronger target state from the best of both organizations.
Retire
Remove duplication, obsolete technology, weak controls, or unnecessary cost.
Redesign
Create a new process, system, role, or policy when neither current state is sufficient.
From close to stabilization
One lifecycle. Changing evidence.
01Pre-closeThesis · continuity
02Day 1Readiness · control
03Day 30Differences · dependencies
04Day 60Decisions · capacity
05Day 100Operating-model transition
06StabilizeOwnership · adoption
07RealizeValue capture
The value ledger
Track value beyond identification.
- 01Identified
- 02Validated
- 03Approved
- 04Implemented
- 05P&L visible
- 06Realized
Cost-conscious modernization
Faster, smarter integration without unnecessary platform spend.
The objective is not to flood the organization with software. The first move is to inventory current tools, licenses, processes, workflows, and data sources. Then simplify friction, automate repeatable effort, and buy only when the economics and capability case are stronger than reuse.
Reuse
Leverage current systems, licenses, workflows, and data sources.
Simplify
Remove unnecessary steps before automating complexity.
Automate
Reduce manual comparison, chasing, updates, and repetitive effort.
Buy
Add technology only when the economic case defeats reuse.
Inventory UiPath, Microsoft 365, Power BI, ServiceNow, Jira, Smartsheet, Salesforce, Oracle, SAP, SharePoint, Teams, and other existing investments before recommending more spend. Do not create software cost in the name of cost reduction.
UiPath-first when it is already owned
Use Process Mining, Task Mining, automation, and Document Understanding before adding another platform.
If those UiPath capabilities are licensed and fit the use case, begin there for process evidence, task analysis, document extraction, workflow automation, update collection, and exception handling. Existing investment should earn the right to solve the problem first.
Buy only for a proven capability gap
A dedicated process-mining platform needs its own economic case.
Add a separate platform only when scale, source-system complexity, conformance analysis, enterprise coverage, or required insight materially exceeds what current tools can deliver—and the additional value justifies the cost and adoption burden.
Modern ways to move faster
Use intelligence where it removes real integration friction.
AI and automation should make comparison, contradiction, overload, decision delay, and value leakage easier to see—not add theater to the status meeting.
01AI-assisted difference mapping
+
Compare policies, SOPs, systems, controls, and operating practices so leaders validate the differences instead of finding each one manually.
02Dynamic dependency tracking
+
Reveal which activities are threatening downstream milestones, not merely which tasks are late.
03Decision SLA & escalation logic
+
Track owner, age, due date, impact, and value at risk so decisions become visible before they become delay.
04Integration contradiction scanning
+
Surface conflicts across updates, milestones, and readiness claims before they mature into failures.
05Capacity heatmapping
+
Compare business-as-usual demand with integration demand and expose overload while leaders can still act.
06Value leakage tracking
+
Follow opportunity through validation, implementation, P&L visibility, and realized results.
07Process & task mining
+
Use process evidence to locate bottlenecks, duplication, rework, and realistic automation opportunities.
08Institutional learning
+
Capture decisions, cycle times, obstacles, and value patterns so the organization improves with every acquisition.
How an engagement can work
Diagnose. Architect.
Integrate. Stabilize.
Diagnose
Review transaction objectives, functional scope, business model, existing plans, major risks, operating assumptions, and leadership expectations.
Architect
Build the roadmap, workstream structure, dependency model, governance cadence, decision framework, capacity view, and value ledger.
Integrate
Coordinate execution across Finance, HR, IT, Legal, Operations, Commercial, Brand, Communications, and other relevant functions while actively managing dependencies, risks, executive decisions, continuity, readiness, and value.
Stabilize
Confirm operating ownership, close gaps, validate readiness, monitor value realization, and transition integration into sustainable governance.
Relevant integration leadership
Grounded in the work of bringing an acquired business into a global enterprise.
At Vertiv, Brooke led the cross-functional integration of Energy Labs into the global parent enterprise, coordinating the transition across functions, systems, governance, process, enterprise requirements, corporate identity, and digital presence.
Her work included aligning stakeholders across teams, establishing integration structure, managing dependencies and decisions, and helping Energy Labs become Vertiv operationally—not simply changing the name above the door—while maintaining continuity.
The measure of success
Not the completion of hundreds of tasks. The creation of one functioning enterprise that delivers the value the transaction was designed to create.
Axiom & Arc brings clarity, structure, and intelligent execution to the integration challenge so the organization moves faster, protects continuity, and captures more value.
Discuss an integration need