Axiom & Arc← All frameworks

Framework · global project investment governance

Readiness before funding

A global portfolio produces better returns when projects reach executives as decision-ready investments—not thin requests for money. This model establishes the evidence, cross-functional agreement, feasibility, and proportional economics required before SteerCo votes.

Design principle
Projects earn the right to compete for enterprise investment.
01

Complete the requirements

The project team documents the full business need and obtains sign-off from every materially impacted function. IT validates technical feasibility, architecture, integration implications, security, and delivery assumptions.

02

Prove execution readiness

The accountable leader reviews the project plan, scope, milestones, dependencies, resource demand, and delivery ownership. A cost-benefit analysis and completed business case make the problem, proposed value, and evidence explicit.

03

Apply proportional rigor

Large financial or capital investments include NPV, IRR, and payback period. Smaller enablement projects use strategic alignment, operational benefit, time-to-value, risk, feasibility, and resource complexity—protecting discipline without manufacturing bureaucracy.

04

Take a decision-ready portfolio to SteerCo

Executives compare ready projects against enterprise priorities and actual capacity, then vote to fund, sequence, hold, rescope, or stop the work. Approval is a portfolio choice, not an isolated request.

Need this operating logic inside a real portfolio?

Discuss the application